Guest Blog Post, Mark Lewandowski: Paper vs. Plastic; or a Tale of Two Essays

MarkLewandowskiFor many years I resisted submitting my work to online journals.  I suppose I was afraid they didn’t have the reputation of paper journals, and that my university wouldn’t consider them legitimate venues for a creative writing professor’s work.  Or maybe there was something off-putting about reading something on the same plastic device I composed it on.  Reading my work in published form already makes me squirm; too often I want to declunkify numerous sentences.  At least if the story or essay is already in a book or journal there’s not much you can do about it.  It’s there with all its blemishes permanently intact.

Words on a computer screen, on the other hand, seem so ephemeral.  All writers want their work to survive the ages.  A book might become thick with dust, but you can still store, and then later find it on a shelf.  With one click on a computer you can replace your work in an on-line journal with Miley Cyrus’s latest twerking pic.

But two years ago my attitude towards online journals changed completely.  At AWP one year, novelist Leslie Pietrzyk asked me to submit something to Redux, a new on-line journal devoted to “reprinting” stories, poems and essays that had once appeared in journals now “languishing on dusty library shelves.”  No one had ever solicited work from me before.  I was thrilled, even it was “only” for an on-line journal.  Some months later I sent Leslie “Tourist Season at Auschwitz,” which originally appeared in The Gettysburg Review.  (I found out later that the issue containing my essay sold out.)  It appeared in Redux a month or two later.  The journal is a simple affair.  Each weekly issue contains just one story, essay or poem, followed by an account of its composition.  Leslie uses a simple WordPress blogging program with few bells and whistles.  This being a labor of love, Redux can’t pay its contributors.

At about the same time Traveler’s Tales published A Small Key Opens Big Doors, one of four anthologies celebrating the 50th anniversary of the Peace Corps.  It contains my essay “Caroline,” which first appeared some years ago in Cimarron Review. (Like “Tourist Season at Auschwitz,” “Caroline” sprang from the same frantic pile of material I wrote after my three visits to Auschwitz in the early 90’s.)  It’s a beautiful volume—thick, creamy paper, an eye catching, dark red cover.  It looks like an appropriate Christmas gift, or something you’d give to someone going into the Peace Corps.  My remuneration?  Contributor’s copies.

I pushed both the anthology and the online journal, using all the social networking I could stomach:  My blog, Twitter, Facebook, etc.  Because the essays are drawn from a common material I was able to broadcast both on any number of Facebook pages, including ones devoted to Peace Corps Poland, Polish American Writers, and stories of World War II.  I included links to the journal, and links to the appropriate Amazon page.

I soon realized what I’m sure is obvious to others: more people read “Tourist Season at Auschwitz” than “Caroline.”  You can track hits on Redux, same as you can track sales on Amazon.  People responded to “Tourist Season” on all the Facebook pages.  Most of them even said nice things about it.  It got around.  People shared it on other pages. Some still do, in fact. “Caroline?”  Not so much.  Maybe it’s a weaker essay.  I don’t know.  More likely, the anthology is simply harder to share.  Asking someone one to click on a link and read is far easier than asking someone to click on a link, pony up $20, and then wait a week for the book to show up.

And Amazon makes it easy with books.  What about those beautiful literary journals?  Numerous times on my travels around the world people have asked me if they could find stuff I published.  “Sure,” I might say, “just send a check to this university.  Make sure it’s not during the summer.  No one’s going to be there.  Oh, and I really don’t know the volume number containing my story, so just tell them it came out in 1998.  But, given all the delays journals are prone to, the appropriate issue, even though it appeared in 1998, is really, officially, a 1996 issue.  You could just give them my name, but interns come and go; whoever gets your check might not recognize my name.  Just go by the cover art.  Tell them you want the issue with the dog on the cover.  I’m pretty sure there’s only one dog cover.”

I don’t have to do that as often anymore.  Now, I can just say, “Superstition Review.  My name is in the index.”  Not even that, actually.  If they have a smart phone, I can find my work for them immediately.

The other day I was talking to my friend and colleague, Matthew Brennan.  He’s a very well published poet.  I asked him if he ever submitted to online journals.  He shrugged and said, “Nah, I like how the journals look on my book shelf.”

And they do.  I can’t deny it.  I like the feel of them.  I even like how some of the issues containing my work have begun to yellow and grow brittle.  It was a big deal to me when my first story made it into print.  It took a lot of years for it to happen.  When I see that issue of Red Cedar Review on my shelf it’s like looking at the trophy I won for little league baseball.  When the journal first came out I didn’t give much thought to readers.  First and foremost I wanted to see my name in print.

Now I think more about an audience.  I have enough paper journals on my shelf; I want to be read.  For good or bad it’s simply easier to reach an audience with an online journal than with a paper one.  Besides, if someone likes my work, say in Superstition Review, they can click on the appropriate link, pony up $20, and in a week my book will be in their mail box.  Sure, journals containing your work look nice when you get them.  You know what else looks good?  Royalty checks.

13 thoughts on “Guest Blog Post, Mark Lewandowski: Paper vs. Plastic; or a Tale of Two Essays

  • September 22, 2013 at 7:49 pm

    There are definitely ups and downs to both sides of publishing when it comes to online vs. hard copy. I’m another who tends to prefer hard copies since I like the feel and the look of them; I also don’t have to worry about my device getting stolen, broken, or otherwise become inaccessible. But there on the other hand, online journals have their place too and come with benefits hard copies severely lack. I think maybe the moral is that both are equally important?

  • September 22, 2013 at 7:50 pm

    This was a very enlightening post. I’m glad I am not the only with this fear of online taking over the physical journal. I mean it is as you say, “A book might become thick with dust, but you can still store, and then later find it on a shelf.” However, I also agree that online is becoming increasingly easier in getting one’s stuff out there to be viewed, and then in some ways, easier to get paid.

  • September 23, 2013 at 4:23 am

    Great post and I loved your title as well. I definitely believe that it’s all about how people perceive technology and whether or not people are willing to use it to their advantage or compete with it. At the end of the day, we realize that there’s no way of competing with it- we just have to adapt to it and learn how to benefit from it. It’s unfortunate to not have that feeling anymore of an actual book or journal in your hand, but like you mentioned the royalty checks look so much better and make it all worth while!

  • September 26, 2013 at 3:40 pm

    This is a great post! I definitely have struggled in the past between paper and electronic versions of books and journals. My mom got me a kindle last year for my birthday and I have finally begun to use it because it took me a little while to make the transition from my beloved hard-copies to the electronic copies. It just felt more real and personal when I was actually holding the book but I eventually got used to reading electronic versions and now I love my kindle! I agree with what Jasmine said. We really just have to learn to adapt as technology becomes more advanced and more widely used.

  • September 27, 2013 at 2:20 pm

    Great post! There are certainly pros and cons to both formats. There really is nothing quite like a bound edition with my work in it. But, I really enjoy the ease of sharing via the social networks. My last experience was with a lit mag that offered both the online version, along with a link to a printer who was providing hard copies (for a fee, of course!). The best of both worlds, really!

  • September 28, 2013 at 9:52 am

    Very good post! With all the technology coming out everyday, people have been moving toward electronic versions. Im a fan of the electronic versions as i can always have it with me, but their is pros and cons to both sides of this coin.

  • October 6, 2013 at 2:10 am

    There’s definitely something rewarding about seeing your own writing in a physical form, something you can hold in your hands as proof that other people are holding it and reading it too. I’m certain that a lot of people knock the merit in having something published online. But a publication is a publication. It seems silly to limit oneself to only printed journals when there are so many really respectable online journals looking for work. I hope a lot of writers will grow to see how many opportunities there are in the online realm.

Leave a Reply